Re: That's been two BNN analysts now who have had a sly smerk when asked about NOT

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

diamondj

Rank: Vice President [?]

Points: 1112 [?]

Votes: 90 Score: 3.3 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Re: That's been two BNN analysts now who have had a sly smerk when asked about NOT

in response to

That's been two BNN analysts now who have had a sly smerk when asked about NOT

new_guy

posted on Aug 12, 2009 11:52AM

I do not have a lot of faith in the guests/analysts that are promoted on BNN. They have their own agendas. With that said though I see your point and I think we would all like more transparency to a degree.