HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Weighing in on "potential" size of a snowman, Those who want facts, read NR's :)

Hi Mucker,

good to have someone on this board with 40 years of experience in the nickel mining business.

With this much of insider knowledge, I would like to ask you to clarify your statements in your latest post :

" Grades of 1.2% and 2.4% nickel are not considered as higher grades by anyone in the nickel mining industry. Most established underground nickel mines consider 1% nickel marginal at best."

"Vale in Sudbury have suspended all their deep mining development, and are reassessing these projects because their not sure they can mine them at a profit. These areas have a much higher grade than 2%."

Can you give some specific examples for your statements, because my DD shows that there are not many deposits (at least in Canada), that show average grades much higher than 2% Ni ?

Refering to Noronts latest presentation (p. 18), Eagle 1A ranks quite high in the komatiite deposit comparison with an average Ni grade of 2.12%.

The majority of these deposits would be in the range of 0.5% to 2.0%, some in the range between 2.0% and 3.0% and only a few would be averaging over 3.0%.

My other DD showed, that Eagle 1 with average gades around 2% Nickel is certainly in the "world-class" league of deposits in Canada, as can be seen by the following examples (and has certainly much better by-product valuations (PGE,Cu) AND is starting just below surface (7metres) :

a) Inco: Birchtree, Manitoba: 1,80% Nickel (13,6 Mt)

b) Falconbridge: Onaping-Craig, Sudbury: 1,55% Nickel (23,5 Mt)

c) Falconbridge: Raglan, Quebec: 2,85% Nickel (19 Mt)

d) Falconbridge: Montcalm, Timmins: 1,5% Nickel (7,2 Mt, not in production)

e) Inco, Kelly Lake: 1,77% Nickel (10,5 M)

f) Inco, Copper Cliff South, 830 Ore Body: 1,27% Nickel (2,7 Mt, not in production)

g) Inco, Copper Cliff North,138 Ore Body: 0,9% Nickel (300.000 t, not in production)

h) Creighton (Deep Deposit, >3000m): 81.000 t @ 4,6% Nickel

It would be nice if you could give some more examples that support your statement of grades around 2.0% Ni "NOT being considered higher grades" and "suspended projects with much higher grades than 2.0%" .

Thanks for sharing your knowledge.

FANTOMAS

P.S: Most of the above mentioned examples of mines and projects are mining in depths between 1300 and 3050 METRES (NOT FEET) !

So good to hear that we are at 900 metres (but still in mineralization) !

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply