Keegan, while on the surface your statement seems plausible rest assured that if a couple of mailroom posters actually came forward with some "real" number crunching they would have got thumbs from me and from most that read here, thats fact.

the numbers game, Old Joe and others are spot on, just where do you think this nickle came from, myself and most here know the lenses are connected one way or the other and most likely these same 3 lenses are a just a small part of a much, much larger system lying in wait of the drill.

The time now is "prove up" time, drill it time.

I am aligned to the facts.

minimum 350m strike length, 178.8 in lense B verticle intercept, 149.5 in lense C.

with these numbers we can get an approximation of X dimension and Y dimension.

input what you like for a width for the Z dimension.

for this demo i will use what is think is conservative.....75m

350 x 328.8 x 75 x 3.5 = 30,208,500 Not far from Glorieuxs'

point is, crunch em yourselves, draw your ore bodies out on paper and theorize for yourself. While we wait for more from Wes.

Cheers.