HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: step out hole required!
4
Sep 17, 2009 05:10PM
18
Sep 17, 2009 07:07PM
4
Sep 18, 2009 07:29AM
4
Sep 18, 2009 07:53AM
3
Sep 18, 2009 09:31AM
4
Sep 18, 2009 09:37AM
29
Sep 18, 2009 10:06AM
1
Sep 18, 2009 10:30AM
You missed my point... Yes lens and B and C are too deep for open pit. I was making a point by stating if what miskealp1 had suggested was in fact the case, as he states it might be more postively interpreted. However, if this was too deep for open pit (the lateral step-out mineralization), would it be any better than what we have now, although possibly more favourably interpreted? Right now we have good chunk of minerlization concentrated along a vertical axis. You get it? B.
29
Sep 18, 2009 12:45PM
17
CMP
Sep 18, 2009 01:53PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply