"Rosehill, I am surprised at your comments from today and yesterday. You seem to be emphasizing your concern that the share price will drop to an unlikely (IMHO) level.

You have been on this board from the beginning, and I had an impression of you that did not include being as nervous an investor as your posts now seem to indicate. I would almost think someone else was posting, using your account. To be frank, if your comments were made by a new board member, I would think they were an attempt at soft bashing.

If I am wrong with these comments, please accept my sincere apologies, but I don't see the value of your remarks, especially for new investors who may be reading them."

Regards,

Canseco

Hi Canseco,

I'm the same Rosehill who has been around since the beginning. I think you will agree with me when I state that much has happened since then. We have celebrated the good times and supported each other during the bad times. In fact, several private forums have sprung up during this period allowing invited members to speak freely about the good and the bad. Yes, you heard me correctly. Members on the private forums are allowed to state concerns regarding Noront or the stock price. These folks are well respected members of this forum and IMHO have a lot to offer.

Whats wrong with this picture? It seems to me that the Agoracom forum for Noront is loosing out on some valuable information. These are comments and opinions posted by long-term members of this board. If I didn't have membership to these private forums I would not see some of the concerns these posters have on an ongoing basis.

You need to as yourself the question:

Why the need for private forums when we have a good forum in place?

I'm not going to discuss the comments I made last week. It will serve no purpose and will most likely anger some of the members on this forum. From the count you received on your comment to me I can see that at least 41 members will be upset if I continue down this path.

I will not continue this discussion. This is my final post on the subject.

"An information silo is a management system incapable of reciprocal operation with other, related management systems. A bank's management system, for example, is considered a silo if it cannot exchange information with other related systems within its own organization, or with the management systems of its customers, vendors, or business partners. "Information silo" is a pejorative expression that is useful for describing the absence of operational reciprocity. Derived variants are "silo thinking", "silo vision", and "silo mentality".

The expression is typically applied to management systems where the focus is inward and information communication is vertical. Critics of silos contend that managers serve as information gatekeepers, making timely coordination and communication among departments difficult to achieve, and seamless interoperability with external parties impractical. They hold that silos tend to limit productivity in practically all organizations, provide greater opportunity for security lapses and privacy breaches, and frustrate consumers who increasingly expect information to be immediately available and complete. Although much has been written about them, information silos are becoming far more recognized as the major reason why organizations are unable to take full advantage of the Internet's power to interconnect business processes."