You are the last one on this forum that I would question ( presume I speak for the vast majority here) about your comments, however I must with regard to "a lot of the intercepts were sub-par". I presume you are referring to today's news release.

What is sub-par about these gold intercepts?
NOT-08-1G058 1.1m 12.65g/t
NOT-08-1G051 10.0m 1.72g/t
Including 4.4m 3.43g/t
NOT-08-1G062 9.6m 1.54g/t
Including 4.4m 3.04g/t
NOT-08-1G039 24.0m 1.01g/t

Hole 39 has something to be desired because having a very good lenght that 1.01 gram is border line thin and depends on even higher gold price or will be extracted as a tunnel to another vein.
Hole 58 with it's 1.1 meter is being compensated by the extra rich vein. I presume that it needs to be excaveted only to about three meter width for comfortable passage by machinery.
The other two, especially with the "Including" intercepts, are great.

And what do you consider par?
I am aware that canadian labout rates are fairly high, energy in form of oil are major factors in contributing to extraction and operational costs.

I seek enlightenment. Ed