Hoov - re comparison of total tonnage
in response to
by
HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"
NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)
Message: Hoov - re comparison of total tonnage
Hoov,
Thanks for pasting that graph from Dundee comparing nickel-copper+PGE deposits. I understand you are taking a break for health reasons so please do not feel obliged to respond unless this will be a lift to your day.
I am curious about the selection of deposits on the graph from Dundee. Noticeably missing are Sudbury and Norilsk (unless I am overlooking them) which do have all of the minerals. Dumont appears to have low-grade nickel only (0.4%). Mt Keith is also low-grade and does not appear to have much copper. Thompson and Raglan are obvious choices for comparison.
Any thoughts to enlighten us here?
I am posting another graph of nickel-copper & pge deposits.
New Message
Please
login
to post a reply