Joe, the specific gravity difference may or may not be the reason for the difference in numbers, specifically what was Don Hoy using as the density? In the range that we all were at the time?

The 72 million was thier number, mounted in thier presentation last December and they would have had to use as you say all the available information to them at the time in order to come up with 72.

Agaim, this was FWR's number, since that time and all FWR shareholders know that there's been numerous holes punched in the ground and all would add to tonnage considerably.

For it not to add to the tonnage and FWR to post the 50/60 millions would imply that the number of 72 was really way out of whack, hence my question and NOT's postition on same.

"but are instead using ONLY those Drill Result Assays Reported and in the Public Domain."

I take this to mean that in light of the tonnage discrepancy this would mean that FWR has been holding back and holding back a whack....is this an accurate take on the above line?

I am sorry, i can't get by the issue, in order to get to 72 they would have used all available data to make that presentation jump off the page, dressed up in the little black dress, attractive to investors.

Perhaps what we have witnessed is FWR cleansing, a coming clean if you will about what's down below. Yes i fully expect for Mac to add to the 50/60 as the days go by, perhaps even today. NOT has every right to put it out there. Because FWR put 72 out last December.

They should be adding to the 72 instead.

lol, quite evident that i've struck some nerves by posting my thoughts on this, good, it was meant to make people take a look at a specific situation.

Respectfully

Notster