Re: The problem with a NOT new offer

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

phats

Rank: Vice President [?]

Points: 3552 [?]

Votes: 182 Score: 3.1 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Re: The problem with a NOT new offer

in response to

The problem with a NOT new offer

sag4tag

posted on Nov 26, 2009 11:24AM

"So if NOT did this it would really be for the share holders not MAC. But the split would be done under NOT's control not Mac's. After the deal was done I guess NOT could always offer Mac a job."

Bring on the second offer the current CLF offer is basically benefiting management,option holders and warrant holders with their .70 payment instead of .55. What is wrong with retail getting what they deserve?

Respectfully,

Phats...(Sean)

8 Recommendations

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

Please to post a reply