Well it's certainly an N.R. but not one that I believe is directed as much to the investor as it is to the industry if it's to be of any practical use. On the investor side it strikes me they offer this up as something of an obvious return to their position on Cr not being of primary interest and having extra complications. Be that as it may, it looks like they're trying to cast some dispersions. I hope this is not the case as it's a bit feeble as seems a bit in conflict with the fact that they are attempting to commit great resource to obtaining FWR when their main thrust is supposed to be the Eagles Nest. It's like politics, your actions can make great sense but when you talk about them it raises suspicions about your motivations. Did we really need to hear this NR? Was it something they hadn't already conveyed at some point? Looking forward to something with some meat on the bones.