HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: Wouldn't a HALT be... What? - OOPS #2
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
Wouldn't a HALT be...
6
rwinger7717
Dec 04, 2009 09:55AM
Re: Wouldn't a HALT be...

colombo10
Dec 04, 2009 10:01AM
Re: Wouldn't a HALT be...
1
rwinger7717
Dec 04, 2009 01:48PM
Re: Wouldn't a HALT be... What?
3
Edgy
Dec 04, 2009 04:11PM
Icon president Re: Wouldn't a HALT be... What? - Rwinger
10
MISFIT1
Dec 04, 2009 04:16PM

Sorry folks,

End of a long week. Thanks to Newbers to pointing out my error regarding Windfall.

Rather than 4800 g / tonne over 4.8 metres, it should have read:

The assayed, weighted average of the three assay tests for the six individual samples over the

4.80 meters (15.7 feet) were; 1792.9 g/t (52.30 oz/t), 800.1 g/t (23.33 oz/t) from the fire assays

and 1327.9 g/t (38.74 oz/t) for the metallic screening assay.

But that is history from 2006. I am looking forward to the day when they do HALT this stock again. What a day that will be.

M1.

4 Recommendations
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
Share
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply