This is in response to a posting Re: Infrastructure ? by AafabVentures posted on Jan 25, 10 04:05

Aafab:

I salute you!

I felt privileged to read your set of ideas!

I feel that these ideas are visionary and inspirational, I feel these should be shared and promoted far beyond the confines of this Forum to movers and shakers of our society, and to the public at large, c.c.-d (Carbon copied) to every Engineering Faculty, every parliamentarian, and to all trade union leaders in North America. The editorial writers will do the rest to make sure, that the ideas are seeded, cultivated, and turned into realities rather sooner than later.

(The process has started already: No doubt, some of Cliff’s directors have had unknowingly shared some of your visions when they decided to invest in the chromium deposits in the Ring of Fire, and they put some serious monies on the table). After all, there is more to investment in mining resources than pining daily about fluctuating stock prices.

With your permission, for the benefit of those fellow shareholders who may not have seen your original posting, I will re-publish here in its entirety:

“……in response to Re: Infrastructure? by AafabVentures posted on Jan 25, 10 04:05PM

I believe that the abundance of accessible and cheap chromium will result in an immediate paradigm shift in our expectations of infrastructure. (Starting with pipelines and civil structural construction) Soon, our environmental and safety sensitivities will no longer support the use of corrosion susceptible steel for these uses when the obvious and already documented failures have proven to be catastrophic and probable. (when not if)

An open mind could envision the rebirth of the AmeriCanadian Auto industry and subsequent world market domination as a result of the design and manufacture of a corrosion resistant / obsolete resistant permanent automobile / mass transit answer.

Rome had this figured out thousands of years ago.

As race of intelligence … chromium may provide an advantage to metal in the 21st century, what plastic provided to paper in the 20th century and what concrete and stone provided to wood 2300 years ago.

Then we can concentrate on more progressive and less consumptive ideals …”

Aafab:

By private messaging I will ask you for your permission to forward the above to Diane Francis and Peter Koven, both of the National Post/Financial Post, and to the Deans of the engineering faculties of the U. of Toronto and the McMasters Universities, unless you will do it yourself.

Best regards,

durban1

P.S.: My original intent was to include the above comments with my previous posting “Re: Infrastructure? Thank you praesens”, but abandoned the idea in order not to rain in on his parade. Subsequently I have been away from my computer for a while.

This is in response to a posting Re: Infrastructure ? by AafabVentures posted on Jan 25, 10 04:05

Aafab:

I salute you!

I felt privileged to read your set of ideas!

I feel that these ideas are visionary and inspirational, I feel these should be shared and promoted far beyond the confines of this Forum to movers and shakers of our society, and to the public at large, c.c.-d (Carbon copied) to every Engineering Faculty, every parliamentarian, and to all trade union leaders in North America. The editorial writers will do the rest to make sure, that the ideas are seeded, cultivated, and turned into realities rather sooner than later.

(The process has started already: No doubt, some of Cliff’s directors have had unknowingly shared some of your visions when they decided to invest in the chromium deposits in the Ring of Fire, and they put some serious monies on the table). After all, there is more to investment in mining resources than pining daily about fluctuating stock prices.

With your permission, for the benefit of those fellow shareholders who may not have seen your original posting, I will re-publish here in its entirety:

“……in response to Re: Infrastructure? by AafabVentures posted on Jan 25, 10 04:05PM

I believe that the abundance of accessible and cheap chromium will result in an immediate paradigm shift in our expectations of infrastructure. (Starting with pipelines and civil structural construction) Soon, our environmental and safety sensitivities will no longer support the use of corrosion susceptible steel for these uses when the obvious and already documented failures have proven to be catastrophic and probable. (when not if)

An open mind could envision the rebirth of the AmeriCanadian Auto industry and subsequent world market domination as a result of the design and manufacture of a corrosion resistant / obsolete resistant permanent automobile / mass transit answer.

Rome had this figured out thousands of years ago.

As race of intelligence … chromium may provide an advantage to metal in the 21st century, what plastic provided to paper in the 20th century and what concrete and stone provided to wood 2300 years ago.

Then we can concentrate on more progressive and less consumptive ideals …”

Aafab:

By private messaging I will ask you for your permission to forward the above to Diane Francis and Peter Koven, both of the National Post/Financial Post, and to the Deans of the engineering faculties of the U. of Toronto and the McMasters Universities, unless you will do it yourself.

Best regards,

durban1

P.S.: My original intent was to include the above comments with my previous posting “Re: Infrastructure? Thank you praesens”, but abandoned the idea in order not to rain in on his parade. Subsequently I have been away from my computer for a while.

This is in response to a posting Re: Infrastructure ? by AafabVentures posted on Jan 25, 10 04:05

Aafab:

I salute you!

I felt privileged to read your set of ideas!

I feel that these ideas are visionary and inspirational, I feel these should be shared and promoted far beyond the confines of this Forum to movers and shakers of our society, and to the public at large, c.c.-d (Carbon copied) to every Engineering Faculty, every parliamentarian, and to all trade union leaders in North America. The editorial writers will do the rest to make sure, that the ideas are seeded, cultivated, and turned into realities rather sooner than later.

(The process has started already: No doubt, some of Cliff’s directors have had unknowingly shared some of your visions when they decided to invest in the chromium deposits in the Ring of Fire, and they put some serious monies on the table). After all, there is more to investment in mining resources than pining daily about fluctuating stock prices.

With your permission, for the benefit of those fellow shareholders who may not have seen your original posting, I will re-publish here in its entirety:

“……in response to Re: Infrastructure? by AafabVentures posted on Jan 25, 10 04:05PM

I believe that the abundance of accessible and cheap chromium will result in an immediate paradigm shift in our expectations of infrastructure. (Starting with pipelines and civil structural construction) Soon, our environmental and safety sensitivities will no longer support the use of corrosion susceptible steel for these uses when the obvious and already documented failures have proven to be catastrophic and probable. (when not if)

An open mind could envision the rebirth of the AmeriCanadian Auto industry and subsequent world market domination as a result of the design and manufacture of a corrosion resistant / obsolete resistant permanent automobile / mass transit answer.

Rome had this figured out thousands of years ago.

As race of intelligence … chromium may provide an advantage to metal in the 21st century, what plastic provided to paper in the 20th century and what concrete and stone provided to wood 2300 years ago.

Then we can concentrate on more progressive and less consumptive ideals …”

Aafab:

By private messaging I will ask you for your permission to forward the above to Diane Francis and Peter Koven, both of the National Post/Financial Post, and to the Deans of the engineering faculties of the U. of Toronto and the McMasters Universities, unless you will do it yourself.

Best regards,

durban1

P.S.: My original intent was to include the above comments with my previous posting “Re: Infrastructure? Thank you praesens”, but abandoned the idea in order not to rain in on his parade. Subsequently I have been away from my computer for a while.