Re: if 2 distinct entities forming as suggested in last post then

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

khareema

Rank: President [?]

Points: 21476 [?]

Votes: 372 Score: 3.6 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Re: if 2 distinct entities forming as suggested in last post then

in response to

Re: if 2 distinct entities forming as suggested in last post then

rapidrob

posted on Apr 11, 2010 10:22PM

"You are right. NOT has to avoid getting totally encircled by CLF influences and then relatively cut off from acquisition opportunities"

The above is quite a statement. Could you elaborate on it just a bit. The last time I looked at my mapnof the ROF, I was pretty sure that CLF had 2 claim groups sewed up, right in the middle of a huge land holding with NOT's name on it.

If anyone was in a position to sit back knowing they have Aces under, It would be NOT.