Strange things going on these days with NOT, some SAT AM light reading..
posted on
Oct 30, 2010 11:13AM
NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)
Patrick FN Anderson vacates the premises..sigh of relief...why did he do that?
NOT does a back door deal with Dundee while telling shareholders it needs no such deal.
5-6 drills turning, no update.
Went looking at PFNA.......to understand the man..
Perhaps it became obvious to him that he'd have a hell of time trying to accomplish at NOT what transpired at Aurelian, lots of nice little gold companies out there these days..
Rarely has mining seen a more polarizing figure than Patrick F. N. Anderson, the former president and CEO of Aurelian Resources. Those initials represent Fergus and Neill, the sort of middle names that Irish immigrants from Belfast bestow upon their only son. But it was probably lost on Anderson's parents how appropriate those initials would become, especially for disgruntled Aurelian shareholders bitter about what they perceived to be an insufficient price paid by Kinross Gold (K-T) for mining's biggest Cinderella story in a decade. When Kinross executives approached Aurelian's board about a takeover in June 2008, no one knew, least of all Anderson, the kind of vitriol that would be unleashed by Aurelian shareholders when the dust had settled. In late July, Kinross offered Aurelian shareholders about $1.2 billion (the deal was worth a little less than $1 billion when it closed in late September) in shares and warrants, or about US$85 for each ounce in the 13.7-million-oz. company-maker Fruta del Norte deposit, in Ecuador (see sidebar on Page 28). Shortly after the news became public in late July of last year, a select group of Aurelian shareholders started to beat the drum about how they had been "taken to the cleaners." Phone calls were made. Form-letter campaigns launched. Word of the "injustice" reached editors at the Globe and Mail, National Post, and here, to Mining Markets' parent publication, The Northern Miner. One letter sent to this office reads: "Patrick Anderson and the Aurelian board of directors gave the company away to Kinross Gold Corporation for a small fraction of its value. To be sure, the officers of Aurelian were well compensated. They received millions of stock options while the rest of the shareholders were taken to the cleaners." The Globe called Anderson but never printed a story. The Post called, too, and printed a story but it was more about shareholder angst than the supposed rotten deal. "It's really a minority. It's a small, very vocal group of vitriolic shareholders who feel they got screwed on the deal. As time goes on I think they are beginning to realize -and most are - that people didn't get screwed on this deal. The reasons we did the deal are unfolding...and it's turned out to be a very good deal for Aurelian shareholders," Anderson explains. "It is the best deal we could have done." He adds: "I think expectations were very high... That group of shareholders was envisioning a share price for Aurelian in the hundreds of dollars. There was this 200 Club group of shareholders who were all going to hold on until the stock reached two-hundred dollars. They had sold themselves on this dream of another rocketing share price like we saw from the forty cents to the forty-dollar level, which, barring another discovery on the property, I don't see how that could have happened." Anderson, though, was playing against the odds from the beginning and despite the obvious success of delineating the biggest gold discovery in a generation, he did not hold the right cards. The Ecuadorian government, meanwhile, led with a pair of aces. In January 2008, the government levied a new 70% commodity price-based windfall tax on miners and almost simultaneously revoked hundreds of mining licences. By April, Ecuador's government, led by Rafael Correa, had suspended all mining and exploration in the country until a new mining law was in place. Anderson could read the tea leaves and Kinross had a decent offer on the table -- a soft landing, even if it didn't come with a boardroom view. "I don't know if I would have added much to the Kinross board," Anderson admits. "As we were moving the discovery toward production, I came to a realization about myself: that I really enjoy and know about exploration. I really don't know much about production but I know enough to know that I prefer exploration." Newsletter writer John Kaiser followed the Aurelian story from the beginning but never invested in the junior. Kaiser watched the remarkable story unfold and contends that Anderson and the Aurelian board were the victims of circumstance. "The Aurelian discovery was a grassroots discovery of a world-class deposit. Unfortunately, geopolitical problems prevented (Aurelian) from getting acquired at full value," Kaiser told Mining Markets. But for every mining industry man in his corner, Anderson probably counts two on the other side, some of them big-time players. One executive with Torontobased Dundee Securities, a firm that fronted some Aurelian financings, once deemed Anderson "unfit to run a public company." "I think they're wrong," Anderson says, returning fire. "We were conscientious. We were as transparent as possible. We stood up under investigation and passed with flying colours. I think we ran a public company well. I think I ran a public company well." Maybe, but other money men went as far as to launch a lawsuit after they watched their warrants expire while, from their perspective, Aurelian sat idle. In July 2006, Robert Cudney's Northfield Capital, Jonpol Investments, Morrie Tobin, Mark Monaghan and Kevin Everingham filed a $3-million claim against Aurelian in the Ontario Superior Court. The suit purported that Aurelian did not do what it could to get listed on the top tier of Vancouver's TSX Venture Exchange. Such a listing would have allowed Aurelian to petition the TSX for a two-year extension of warrants that were owned by the plaintiffs. The listing did not happen in time, however, and the warrants expired. The suit is ongoing but is now Kinross's property. "If we were still Aurelian, and there had been no transaction, we would never settle on that lawsuit. I don't know what Kinross's intentions are," Anderson says. Anderson ruffled more feathers among mining's "old boys" network as part of a group that toppled the board of high-profile junior Noront Resources (NOT-V). Popular former Noront CEO Richard Nemis stepped down in late October after a proxy war for control was launched by Rosseau Asset Management, a hedge fund that owns just less than 10% of Noront. Backed by Rosseau, Anderson is now a Noront director. After living in Vancouver at the time of Anderson's birth, his parents traded life on the Left Coast for another on the Gulf Coast, settling in Pascagoula, Miss., a port city east of New Orleans. That's where Anderson grew up. His family remains in Mississippi but Anderson returned to Canada in 1986 to earn a bachelor's degree in geology from the University of Toronto. He would eventually graduate, but not before a detour found him trying his hand at the culinary arts in 1988. In 1994, after his last exam but before graduation, he headed to Venezuela for a field-based job and remained there for years. It was where he would work with Keith Barron, who helped Anderson found Aurelian. The junior's story is the stuff of legend; part folklore, part reality. Anderson and Barron applied for their first concession in Ecuador's Cordillera del Condor in February 2001, following six weeks of prospecting in some remote regions of the country. Two months later, in a turn of good fortune, the Ecuadorian government announced new mining rules that gave individuals and companies one month to convert their outstanding concession applications - some more than 10 years old - into titles and begin paying patents. In May 2001, about 80% of the country's concessions were declared void, giving Aurelian the rare chance to acquire a large, contiguous land package. Seeing the opportunity, Aurelian personnel took turns waiting in line at the patent office for weeks to be near the front when concessions became available. Aurelian augmented its land position by purchasing the La Zarza concession from private interests in July 2002 and the concession became the core of the Condor project - 950 sq. km of mining concessions and home to Fruta del Norte, the epic gold-silver deposit. Aurelian Resources went public in 2003, raising $3 million at $0.50 a share. Going back a little further, exploration on La Zarza by Australia's Climax Mining from late 1996 through mid-1998 turned up the Ubewdy, Bonza and Las Peñas prospects. But after minor drilling on other prospects returned only modest grades, Climax let its concessions lapse. In 2004, Aurelian sunk 28 holes totalling 6,900 metres into Bonza and Las Peñas and outlined 500,000 oz. gold at a grade of slightly more than 1 gram gold per tonne, certainly far less than bonanza grade. By the end of 2005, Aurelian was wrapping up almost two years of regional sampling that had outlined another 33 gold targets at Condor. Those targets were ranked and slated to be systematically drilled in 2006 but Aurelian had little cash left. Anderson says this was the low point of his career. "We were nearly out of money...We had no audience. The phone calls weren't being returned. That was very frustrating," Anderson recalls. "The defining moment, of course, is when we made the discovery." Earlier in 2005, Steve Leary had joined the company as exploration manager, bringing along experience in epithermal systems. He reinterpreted a pull-apart basin identified by Climax, and decided that the basin infill conglomerate was mostly post-mineralization and, therefore, epithermal deposits could lie buried below the basin sediments. Leary and Anderson took the revised interpretation and exploration model to the board and pitched the members on spending Aurelian's remaining treasury to drill one of Condor's most favourable targets, Fruta del Norte. The deposit is an intermediate sulphidation epithermal gold-silver system, hosted in andesitic volcanics and buried inside a Jurassic pull-apart basin that basically preserved most of the epithermal system. The third hole into Fruta Del Norte hit the buried, gold-rich system. One intersection returned 8.4 grams gold per tonne uncut across 205 metres. Another hit 189 metres averaging 24 grams gold per tonne uncut. "I checked (the assay results). Re-checked them. Called up the lab to make sure there weren't any errors," Anderson recollects. "I was terrified, terrified that we screwed up somehow." When everything checked out, he ran into the street to share the news with anyone he could find until he had a sudden revelation. "I had two different shoes on," he recalls. Since that moment Anderson has been on something of a roll. He recently turned 40 and lives in English Bay in Vancouver with his new wife, a former mining analyst with Genuity Capital Markets. They have travelled to Spain, surfed in Costa Rica, and Anderson now owns a sea kayak. Anderson, in many ways a child at heart, has another hobby -sharing a growing collection of remote-control helicopters with Aurelian's former vice-president of corporate development, Tim Warman. The helicopters are something Anderson describes as "just fun." When he's not toying, Anderson serves as director of several juniors: U3O8 Corp. (UWE-V), Colossus Minerals (CSI-T) and Noront. "I'm generating a few other projects in the back-room, exploration projects in other parts of the world," Anderson says. "I usually invest in an industry I know, our industry. I look at the projects and I look at the people. I look at the philosophy behind the exploration and the discovery." Chances are he will never find another discovery like Fruta del Norte, but investors, disgruntled or otherwise, might be wise to follow Anderson on his next adventure. --------- Looking Back On July 24, 2008, Kinross Gold (K-T) offered for each Aurelian common share, 0.317 of a Kinross common share, plus 0.1429 of a warrant, with each warrant entitling the holder to acquire one Kinross common share. The Kinross warrants have an exercise price of $32.00 per Kinross common share and will expire five years after the date on which Kinross first pays for Aurelian common shares tendered to the offer. Kinross issued about 47 million common shares related to the transaction or about 8% of Kinross's outstanding common shares at the time (Kinross issued another 24 million shares as part of an equity financing in January 2009). Based on the preceding 20-day volume-weighted average price (prior to the date of the bid) of Kinross's common shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX), and assuming a value of C$0.92 per fractional warrant, the value of the offer is C$8.20 per Aurelian common share, which at the time represented a premium of roughly 63% over the preceding 20-day volume-weighted average price of Aurelian common shares. About 94% of Aurelian shareholders tendered to Kinross's offer.
© 2010Mining Markets. All Rights Reserved.
1. This is great news for investors at large. I have followed this story intimately and the Kinross bid is a total and complete farcical insult to Aurelian shareholders.
Posted at 1:20PM on Aug 8th 2008 by Lindsay Ross
2. This deal between Kinross and Aurelian is criminal. When you look at the FACTS, a sweet deal has been cut for Kinross, a no lose scenario. It should be investigated, and the board of directors of Aurelian kicked to the curb. They have lined their pockets while shafting their shareholders. A disgrace.
Posted at 11:22AM on Aug 9th 2008 by safeharbour
3. I agree Aurelians board has not looked after its share holders. Why does the TSX just keep turning their backs? Does this not put a permanent stain on all its gold companies?
Posted at 12:04PM on Aug 9th 2008 by Dbunker
4. How did management do its fiduciary duty when it accepted this horrendously inadequate lowball offer from Kinross? All of the longs in this prolific gold find are willing to wait for the release of the mining mandate which has been anticipated to be acceptable by others in Equador, even Kinross. Too many questions and no answers! I will NOT tender my shares. This is a travesty and an insult to the long suffering faithful shareholders.
Posted at 12:57PM on Aug 9th 2008 by Notie Girl
5. A respected analyst values Aurelian at $15.75 & takes off 30% for political risk
which nets at $11.. The weak kneed management, for some unknown reason, sold out shareholders by agreeing to a private placement of 15 million shs. at $4.75 & also agreed to a share exchange with Kinross which in effect offers little over $5. of mkt. value. What is the management's agenda???
Posted at 5:57PM on Aug 9th 2008 by Joe Campbell
6. WHY SELL before the OFFICIAL MINING LAW is revealed??(due aug-sept)18mil.ozs X $800=$14.4billion VALUE!! WHY WOULD the BOD agree to a price of $900mil.IN STOCK?? the K stock continues to fall taking ARU with it!! WE WILL NOT SUBMIT SHARES to this NON-OFFER!! and WE WILL REPLACE ANDERSON and the BOD
Posted at 2:26PM on Aug 9th 2008 by joe king
7. I believe Aurelian's CEO is on record along with the CEO's of other mining companies in Ecuador as commenting that the draft copy of Ecuadors' new mining law is workable, yet as soon as the Kinross deal is public he casts doubt, mentioning country risk, political risk etc. This from a man who wants to do a deal with a company that has a major operation in Russia. A farcical low ball deal at that.
Posted at 7:59PM on Aug 25th 2008 by Langosta
8. How can the board of directors accept this deal when it is worth much more, maybe $25.00 a share? They lined their pockets and are leaving the shareholders on their own. There is a rotten apple in the barrel, not naming names. You know who you are! Thanks for nothing!
Posted at 2:34PM on Aug 9th 2008 by nofixx
9. this deal is too BAD to be true for aurelian shareholders. the company's management sold its shareholdes down the river for a boatload of stock options. they sold the company to kinross at the worst possible time, for a lower price than anything i could imagined. i can't see why anyone in his right mind would tender his shares to kinross at this price.
the OSC needs to look into this deal and find out exactly how this could have happened.
Posted at 2:30PM on Aug 9th 2008 by aitakahashi
10. The timing of this deal is highly suspect. The Ecuadorian government issued a mandate to suspend mining whilst the new laws are written. These new laws are now written and awaiting presidential review. The initial draft of these laws was miner friendly. Selling out the shareholders for a severely discounted price prior to the confirmation of the law approval is nothing short of shameful.
Posted at 2:37PM on Aug 9th 2008 by BritNick
11. I fully agree with any of my fellow posters on Agoracom. This deal stinks, something is rotten in Denmark, I mean in this deal.
Patrick Anderson how could you give away your dream and ours?
Posted at 2:49PM on Aug 9th 2008 by Weisz1
12. The Shareholders of Aurelian ultimately will decide the fate of ARU and not a corrupt President and Board of Directors. I as well as many other shareholders will not be tendering their shares to this disgusting offer by Kinross.
When Kinross fails to get the required number of shares, the shareholders should turf the president and BOD that backed this deal and install a new board that will add shareholder value and only recommend a deal that is in the best interest of shareholders.
We shareholders, retail and institutional have way more power to direct the destiny of Aurelian than this corrupt BOD do.
Wes
Posted at 3:05PM on Aug 9th 2008 by wes albers
13. Strongly suggest you visit the agoracom board if you are a shareholder of Aurelian. They have posted a lot of great facts to help all shareholders make an informed decision on whether or not to tender their shares. Based on these facts the Kinross offer appears seriously undervalued. If you agree, this is a great way to get your voice heard through the internet. The Calgary Herald & FP have already picked up the story, with more to come. Welcome to the 21st century.
14. Thanks to Agoracom for providing the small retail investor with a forum that is run with efficiency and decorum.
Without this means of communicating through the INTERNET, the small investor had limited resources at his fingertips, to try to decipher the complex and brutal world of stock investing.
As to the specifics of this travesty of "injustice", I am especially upset over the "gift" of the 15 million shares that were awarded to Kinross....for whatever operation needs ARU didn't have the funds for.... which were non-existent.
The time line of discussions and meetings that Kinross had with ARU, make the insider sales and awarding of BoD options, terribly suspect and transparently obvious
Long For CASH!...
P.S.- for any future bidders, please make a cash offer!
Posted at 1:45PM on Aug 10th 2008 by Geoff Ashby
15. I find it very suspect that stock options were granted around the same time as a confidentialy agreement was signed. Kinross was privy to more information than any other shareholder and thus managment has failed miserably to maximize shareholder value. Also why sell now. the mining rules were coming out and rumored to be workable!! After Kinross saw the confidential information they insisted on buying 15 million shares at $4.75 and then turn around to offer to but the compnay using their useless paper shares. It doesn't smell good to me....
Posted at 4:28PM on Aug 9th 2008 by The Chief
16. ARU's BOD has failed miserably in their fiduciary obligations to their shareholders.
How could they do this deal when we are just expecting the release of what most industry observers were expecting to be workable mining laws? Why not wait until after this release?
How could they gift Kinross 15MM shares at a huge discount to what Kinross has offered to ARU shareholders when ARU doesn't even need the cash?
Why haven't ARU management released the 80 drillholes they are sitting and the updated 43-101 resource calculation?
Check out Agoracom. We have a list of some 20 questions we'd like answers to. Unfortunately the current ARU BOD and management are not being forthcoming with anwers.
At last count this supposed $1.2B deal is now worth approx. $800MM because Kinross's share price has cratered since the announcement of the deal.
Posted at 9:31AM on Aug 11th 2008 by jdn5
17. Things that make Aurelian Shareholders go Hmmmm
1. What did Dr. Keith Barron, the Co-Founder, learn that caused him to find it necessary to disassociate himself with Aurelian. Dr Barron had the Big Prize in his hands but chose instead to walk away and close the door behind him on every Miner's Dream of a Lifetime! It wasn't Ecuadore's Politics because he's recently teamed up with another Co mining in Eucador.
2. 14MM AUREF.PK Short position - That's a Biggie. Wonder when that position was placed.
3. Kinross signed their 2nd Confidential Agreement 19Oct07
AUR $8.75. Within days AUR $10 with "Hmmm" Volume.
4. Kinross granted Private Placement of 15MM Shs (10%) at $4.75 at the time of the Offer. Previous to the PP Patrick Anderson CEO, told the AGM we had enough funds to last through 2009.
If Kinross gets 50.1% but less than 66.6%, they can, at their option, keep the shares. The 10% PP will sorta help them attain that goal dontja think? Shareholders that tender may still lose their shares if Kinross chooses, even if the Offer isn't 90% successful to force conversion.
5. Previous to the Offer our CEO Patrick Anderson had said publically the new Mineral Law Draft didn't appear to him to hold any detremental surprises. Announcing the Offer he expressed fear of the significant political risk while other Cos in the area expressed their satisfaction in the wording of the Draft.
We've been in labour for over 3 mos for the new Mineral Law to be written
and we ALL agree it WAS a necessity for the people of Eucador that it BE rewritten. WHY then is the Expirey Date of the Kinross Offer 03Sept being PRIOR to the expected issuance date of the New Mineral Law as Pres. Correa has well prepared us to expect the end of September.
6. 03Jun08 our BOD issued themselves 2.3MM options at $4.60.
Relatively close to when a date would have been set to commence discussions of the Offer. Hmmm
7. Our Cut-off for the 43101 was set at 2.3 g/t and still indicated 13.7M oz. What would it be if the "usual" cut- off of .5 been used? 20MM oz? We've drilled what? 80 holes since this was announced. Even as step-out holes, they contain valuable information which hasn't been made available to us. What exactly is Kinross buying from us?
We don't know. We were expecting a Micon?? report to have been published by now to tell us. I bet Kinross knows what they're buying at Dollar Store pricing. Even the maps have even been removed from the Aurelian site. The Site used to contain a wealth of information we could learn something of where our money was going but now, nothing. Is this a TSX Rule when a T/O is in place or was this a Kinross requisition. I think Kinross thought of EVERYTHING!! IMO Absolutely no match whatsoever to our BOD in spite of having what we were told when he (name withheld as it appears I'm wrong) was added to the BOD, a M&A EXPERT.
Then too there was what appeared to me to be over and above the norm Insider Selling prior to the 18Apr08 "Ecuador Stop Work" Announcement
We all dismissed it as no way would we suspect anything by OUR "Above Reproach" CEO Patrick Anderson. Those that did express concern were smacked over the head and Banned being allocated Membership in the Ignore list.
There are other Hmmms on my list but I'm suffering from lack of Oxygen from going Hmmm. Other Members of the Agoracom Discussion Group will surely add their concerns in a more eloquent and knowledgeable way. Me, I'm just a small Retail Shareholder, one voice of many, that wants to see some BOD Butts kicked.
Posted at 5:19PM on Aug 9th 2008 by boardlot
18. Most analysts have a target of $25,why would ARU shareholders accept $8 or less?Because the BOD have made a corrupt deal,only the retail shareholders are vocal about this,smells bad doesnt it.Please go to Agoracom to get an overview of the level of deceit used by Patrick and his allies to sell out,and short change the owners of this company
Posted at 5:14PM on Aug 9th 2008 by baz
19. Has Patrick Anderson, now known by some as Panty Anderson or Pansy Anderson has completely lost his mind but not his fattened wallet?
He now exposes ARU shareholders to a company that has huge political risk (Russia) but reverses an earlier opinion where he was confident that there was minimal threat of anything negative happening in Ecuador but THEN The Kinrats themselves confirm everyone elses opinion that the perceived risk in Ecuador is blown out of proportion?
Message to Agoracom members. I have worked tirelessly on SI and other threads to bring this message to shareholders AND I GET NO HELP? Where are you people?
Here is the thread I wish you would all also post on and bring the case to thousands more investors. Limited posting privileges are free
http://siliconinvestor.advfn.com/subject.aspx?subjectid=54430
Posted at 5:49PM on Aug 9th 2008 by Kerrisdale90210
20. I agree. There is something seriously wrong here and Aurelian's board of directers should be brought to task for accepting this.
Posted at 5:27PM on Aug 9th 2008 by allanna demarco
21. Great to see!! Aurelian's Board is selling us down the river while they eat cavier at the Ritz!!
Posted at 5:36PM on Aug 9th 2008 by CJ Burton
22. The actions of the Ecuadorian government, Aurelian's CEO and Board of directors is highly suspicious and warrants a full indepth investigation. One must ask what is the real reason for the delay of the Mining Draft Law? I guess the most obvious answer would be so Kinross can steal our once in a life time investment away from us for peanuts. Myself and all other Agoracom crew are doing what ever it takes to stop this transaction from proceeding on September 3rd. My shares will not be tendered to this low ball bid.
Posted at 5:50PM on Aug 9th 2008 by wiltshire94
23. I fully agree with other Aurelian shareholders on Agoracom. Kinross offer is absolutely unacceptable. ARU CEO and board should be held accountable for their actions. Please see ARU discussion on Agoracom for more information.
Posted at 6:03PM on Aug 9th 2008 by student123
24. The Kinross offer for Aurelian Resources is a case of "Stacking the Deck" or collusion between the two parties.
Kinross would not have made the offer unless Aurelian gave them a "gift" Private Placement of 15 Million Shares @ $ 4.75 Canadian so they " COULD TENDER THE 15 MILLION SHARES TOWARDS THE BUY-OUT".
In the Kinross offer on page 40 you will find"
"Over the course of these meetings and discussions, the Kinross representatives expressed their view that the
very substantial premium range being sought by Aurelian would only be the basis for a transaction in the event
that the proposed transaction terms included a concurrent private placement that would provide Kinross with a
strategic investment in Aurelian regardless of the outcome of the proposed acquisition. Kinross subsequently
made a non-binding proposal to Aurelian that included such a private placement of 15 million Aurelian Shares,
and for an acquisition of Aurelian on the basis of consideration consisting of 0.317 of a Kinross Share plus
0.1429 of a Kinross Warrant for each Aurelian Share"
This is collusion at its finest !
I always thought that the OSC and the SEC were there to protect the little investor, by making sure that ALL shareholders are treated fairly. This is not happening.
DON'T TENDER YOUR SHARES !!
Posted at 6:36PM on Aug 9th 2008 by Jim Lovell CPA
25. Aurelian bod's motivation is painfully obvious...it is greed, plain and simple. Maybe they feel somehow justified. Maybe they should be given some time to think about it behind bars. If not criminal, what they are doing is morally and ethically wrong and they need to be held accoutable.
Posted at 6:52PM on Aug 9th 2008 by dan hamill
26. Unless everything every person in the mining industry has publicly said about the new mining laws about to come into force affecting this company's primary deposit, it is inconceivable that a responsible board of directors would approve this first, and unbelievably low offer, especially as its value continues to drop by the day. There must be more to this story than the shareholders are being told, and that is what is driving the revolt.
Posted at 7:53PM on Aug 9th 2008 by Wayne Barkauskas
27. http://www.pifinancialcorp.com/email...
referring to page 10:
"In Exhibit 4 we show transactions over the past 10 years involving juniors with undeveloped gold resources. The average acquisition cost since the Dec. 2005 and the +US $500 /oz gold price environment has been $132/oz with a range of US $91 to $227/oz. We believe in the current gold market that Aurelian should be able to command the mid to high end of the $/oz valuation of +$150/oz to $170 per recoverable ounce."
So, say we take the low of the low range of $150/oz and discount it by a ridiculous $30 (for the so call political risk) we get $105/oz.
So 105 x 13.7 million (again the low of the low number) = $1.44 billion MINIMUM.
Divide $1.44 billion by 137 million shares (pre PP) and our per share for the acquisition is $10.51 MINIMUM
Divide $1.44 billion by 152 million shares (post PP thanks to our clever than Trevor management & BOD) and our per share for the acquisition is $9.47 MINIMUM
Also on page 10:
West of West Fault Target Value - Estimate of the chances of Finding FDN 2
We believe there is compelling evidence the FDN gold deposit was offset to the south by the West Fault and that the system type dictates that it likely has +400m to 800m depth potential (see Appendix G). Therefore, we suggest that there are at least another 10M oz to 15M oz to be discovered and that there is a 25% chance (base case) and 50% chance (optimistic case) that it lies on ARU's property, at depths of
28. The Aurelian takeover by Kinross reeks of collusion, malfeasance and fraud. Another black mark on the TSX's escutcheon. Does Canada want a mining industry or not?
Posted at 8:38PM on Aug 9th 2008 by Orange Flash
29. BOD of ARU.T is finish with us and eathing our money.
Deal will not go the way they plan to.
We will go all the way together.
Us here,agoracom people and any other honest person.
Regards
Posted at 10:28PM on Aug 9th 2008 by Ragusa
30. For two and a half years the CEO of Aurelian has gone out of his way to invite my investment in his company — downplaying the Political risks associated with Exploration in Ecuador. Fast forward to July 24/2008 our CEO and the B.O.D. are offered two years salary along with a whack of self appointed options and low and behold accept the first low ball offer thrown their way from Kinross. He and they suddenly proclaim Ecuador to be a great unknown. He and the BOD obviously want out of Ecuador but you can't have it both ways. You can't say it's a great place to invest and then when it's I'm all right Jack time say it the climate stinks. Not the kind or legacy I'd want to leave behind.
Posted at 9:22PM on Aug 9th 2008 by Morse5
31. Anderson may be a good geologist or maybe he just got lucky, I don't know. However as the CEO of the most promising start up gold company we have seen in many years he has shown to be woefully inadequate, lacking the vision, buisness smarts and courage to move this company forward. He should have done the right thing and steped aside long ago. Ditto for all the other passengers, AKA the BOD.
Posted at 11:20PM on Aug 9th 2008 by nomad47
32. How can an Aurelian shareholder evaluate the fairness of this offer when Kinross has seen the results from 80+ drill holes and we haven't.
Posted at 6:33PM on Aug 10th 2008 by Rabidbeaver
33. This takeover offer needs a review by the OSC very badly.
The profits the BoD of Aurelian bestowed upon themselves while ignoring the shared risks of retail investors are blatantly selfish and arrogant.