HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Mining Watch - a must read!

The main point of my post is that Xstrata is not a likely partner for such a physical development. FWR was a major opportunity for X in a core business, could have been taken for pocket change, but they passed on it. CLF can surely develop a strategic partnership with someone who is nickel-centric but X seems very unlikely. Little has changed since FWR went on the block , and while I agree with the concept as presented, I would hope for a Vale, Hudbay, or even a Sherritt. I'd vote for HBM myself, they can operate well in this environment. More copper and even zinc would be a big help. Governments' cost sharing will be key to CLF just going it alone. They love the cheap assets that are more or less in their back-yard.

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply