Thank you for the complement Babe. I don't believe that he is unknowledgeable regarding the ROF. He may have an agenda, and he certainly had opportunity to discuss some of the positives going on in the political arena, the position of Cliff and Baosteel, and the tooting that this is going to be the biggest mining area in Canada in the last 100 years. He chose not too. He iterated his former opinion, but left the door open with the thought that perhaps with infrastructure assured, NOT could become a takeout candidate. He was not strong on NOT as a go alone deal.

There was a lot going on beyond words. Sometimes, it can be the nuance of language, hand and facial gestures and body movement combined together that prompts an understanding of what happened or was meant by what was said.

My daughter now living and working in Montreal in the dental field, is speaking french fluently, but often misses the nuances of the language, and is working hard on mastering that, the beauty of being able to put it all together.

RHammer came close, but one has to not particularly put a negative spin, and look for the pearl that might be there. For me, he spoke a partial truth, you would have slayed him in a court of law....:)....attorney or not.

vermillion