HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: BOL FNC - Re: the idea that Noront needs FNC to get access.
21
Mar 10, 2012 08:28AM
5
Mar 10, 2012 08:55AM
14
Mar 10, 2012 10:20AM
13
Mar 10, 2012 01:50PM
6
Mar 10, 2012 02:11PM
10
Mar 10, 2012 02:12PM
14
Mar 10, 2012 05:21PM
14
Mar 10, 2012 06:39PM
8
Mar 10, 2012 06:57PM
5
Mar 10, 2012 11:29PM
8
Mar 11, 2012 08:55AM
25
Mar 11, 2012 11:07AM

I always appreciate the posts from RHammer and Been There, who invariably provide solid comments.

From my memory, I thought that negotiations to gain access to traditional aboriginal lands under the "duty to consult" principle, also quailfied as exploration expenses, but my quick read of available material indicates that there is some grey areas.

In 2007, the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) sent a letter to the PDAC, providing guidance regarding expenditures related to community consultation, environmental studies and feasibility studies and their eligibility for CEE treatment. However, differences in the interpretation of these guidelines by industry and the CRA have led to some confusion as to which expenses are eligible.

Does anyone know if additional clarity has been put around this issue? You could certainly burn through a lot of CEE money without ever having put a drill bit in the ground.

Lakeside

9
Mar 12, 2012 01:15PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply