HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: Kaiser Bottom Fish Article From 2007
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
Kaiser Bottom Fish Article From 2007
11
rosbg
Sep 26, 2013 12:41PM
Re: Kaiser Bottom Fish Article From 2007
3
B-Jay
Sep 26, 2013 12:54PM

The Kaiser Bottom Fish Article From 2007 talks about the size of the find but I do not consider that as important AS the Quality of it.

Even if it was one tenth the size ( $ value) that we presently know of, it still would be a mine some day.
The size of it would be smaller and would be more dependent on infrastructure to be provided before the mine was developed, but it would happen.

Why you ask?
Return on investment.
That is due to the quality of the ore. Value per ton if it makes things clearer.

Spend a buck and get several back. Not too many places do you get such returns. Well many did on the stock markets before present economic blunder, not now or Very rarely.
Cheers, Ed.

5 Recommendations
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
Share
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply