It seems logical to me that if one person won't do something for the good of many until things are his way but two other people in a similar position will do it anyways, then it makes sense to want one of those two people.

I give you Steven Harper vs. Justin Trudeau or Thomas Mulcair and the ROF.

Perhaps most here are correct in thinking that Tim Hudak and his party will suit the province of Ontario better than Kathleen Wynne and the Libs will. And also perhaps, Justin Trudeau will suit the country and in particular the ROF better than the ill advised, Steven Harper.

I think many know my feelings about our PM. But if not let me be clear. I want him out as soon as possible. But that`s another issue. Concerning the ROF, Harper is clearly not our best choice if he chooses to hold up the process until he has his way.

That`s not the mark of a Prime Minister to me.

I realize that this may not be popular in this forum but then I`ve always walked my own path and I stand by these words..... Replace Harper first, then change Ontario`s gov`t. and we`ll all be better off.

A political statement indeed. But I have endured many statements here over the last year or so. I say all this with the calmest and clearest of mind and the most logical and quickest way to developing the ROF.

Lastly, I thank this forum for the excellent postings today. Very informative, well thought out and chalked full of facts (as opposed to yesterday....).

Strato-Logic