i understand i'm supposed to see the 'other side' when dealing with issues, that's why strategic miner gets these articles for us.

i'm continually disappointed that the miner feels 'everything' written about the rof, and in most cases, everything negative, is to be published for our consumption.

posters have written that the miner is a well known? respected person?

certainly he has the intelligence to read these articles and decide whether they have merit. surely he is able to discern drivel from fact to spare all, the waste of time these articles represent.

they stop progress, they stop new readers from investing in the rof.

what a life the miner leads to simply post the 'other side' for our benefit.

sunday morning reads must be the most depressing days of his life, and these are done all for us.

great 'guy' or not, there is another side to explore and perhaps espouse

after reading some of the article last night, i too googled bill.

thank you ingrid for writing what i could not , last night.