HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: sirius

http://www.miningnews.net/resource-stocks/current-issue/a-win-win-for-sirius-independence/

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-09-03/shareholders-vote-for-sirius-takeover-by-independence-group/6747934

Sirius Resources, Nova project was compared to Noront's Eagles nest as being very similar.

The analysis was done by Raymond James and was found in the Noront Corporate Presentation.

Mark Creasy had 35% ownership in Sirius. RCF will have a similar percentage if they convert the 15 million dollar bridge loan into 45 cent shares by June 30,2016.

It would be nice to see something similar happen to Noront.

“[Shareholders] essentially gained control of IGO, took some money off the table, which was important and got a stake in a new explorer"

Sirius ticked off what they did not want to include in the Merger with Independence group (which were their gold assets in Austrailia).

Shareholders of Sirius received Independence shares and cash.

Then Sirius spun out a new company called ...S2 Resources.

Imagine if Noront could provide a win win scenerio like this.

A company would come in and do a merger with Noront.

Noront would remove the eagles nest from the merger. The company interested in buying would offer cash plus company shares for the chromite side. We as shareholders would see instant money and be able to enjoy growth in the chromite side by receiving these company shares.

Noront could then spin off the eagles nest and call it a new name ie; Eagle Resources in which we would be shareholders. Along with it we'd have our buy out money and have shares in the company that took the chromite.

It sure would be nice to see something like this.

===============================================

A win-win for Sirius, Independence

One can understand why S2 Resources’ Mark Bennett was asked to explore the anatomy of a successful mining deal at Mines and Money London 2015 – the pact he and Mark Creasy managed to pull off at Sirius Resources was a real winner.

.field-input .error { color: red; font-weight: bold; } .field-input .success-message { line-height: 1.5em !important; display: inherit; margin-top: 16px; } .field-input .error.line-block { display: inline-block; margin-top: 10px; } /*.field-input input { padding: 5px; width: 100%; border-radius: 3px; }*/

Mark Bennett at the Sirius Resources offices in the semi-industrial Perth suburb of Balcatta

Sirius was for all intents and purposes an exception in the industry. Within the space of 2.5 years it had found the Nova deposit, drilled it out, permitted it and started mining – a record, Bennett claimed, for a project in Western Australia.

This created a “moving target” for potential bidders, a situation which the company was able to exacerbate through injecting cash from an early stage to keep as many drill rigs running as possible leading to constant news flow and opportunities for the share price to react.

Not every company and potential takeover target has the cash or the confidence to “go out on a limb”, as Bennett said, and do this.

This factor, and Bennett and Creasy’s holdings in Sirius, were key to the nickel developer securing the $A1.8 billion ($US1.3 billion) merger deal with Independence Group (IGO) and being able to spin-off another company – S2 Resources – in the process.

While he said it was important the Sirius-Independence deal was a “win-win” for both companies – something with which many analysts have taken issue considering its reverse takeover nature and the weakening of the nickel price since the deal was announced – it was quite clear Bennett, Creasy and Sirius had come out on top.

And the reason for this? He didn’t say, but he gave enough hints.

“[Shareholders] essentially gained control of IGO, took some money off the table, which was important and got a stake in a new explorer.

“From the IGO side, they got what they really wanted, which was Nova and the team that came with it,” he said.

He kept emphasising the point that a deal needed to be suitable for shareholders and for the “people” involved. “Essentially, nearly everyone was left with a job at the end of a day.”

For Creasy, a 35% shareholder at the time, and Bennett, who had his own stake in the company, a good deal for shareholders and the Sirius people was a good deal for them.

From this example, the way to get the best deal is to ensure both the board and executives are negotiating as both directors and shareholders.

Skin in the game could lead to more cream on top.

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply