Re: Road versus Rail, Opinions
in response to
by
posted on
May 10, 2016 08:01AM
NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)
It is irrelevant for this discussion at this time as to whether railway is for the entire Ring, obviously it is. You object that discussion of road distracts from rail, but the opposite is not true? Noront ( may I add natives also) is ready for road now and has been for at least a couple of years while rail is years away even with chinese involvment and perhaps financing. So we should keep quiet about road and talk of rail?
Nor is anyone asking you to praise Noront. You are most certainly entitled to your opinion, just not in that fashion on this forum.
What I object most is:
1. That you put false statements about our chief executive.
2. Put down Noront while at the same time praise KWG, no bias here?
3. Your version of comments about one company vs another belong on the other forum. Hopefully few there would object to such comments. Yet you come on this forum, my though is only to bash.
4. Last, when we raise objections to your comments you deflect attention instead of validly justifying.
I have posted negative opinions on this forum about politicians, bureaucrats, native demands and even about Noront management but I hope I gave cause for my opinions. Yes, some perhaps many have differed, said so publicly or privately thus I obtained better understanding not only of my opinions but of aspects I was not aware of or did not understand.
Hence I do not object but welcome differing opinions but there are limits.