Another article with exaggerations and poor assesment.

"the potential worth of KWG’s chromite is far greater than Noront’s nickel and copper."
So what. And Noront's chromite does not count? But later on he does admit that Noront does have some ( apparently even with that the reader is led to believe that KWG's is still worth more).
He seems to be under the impression that it is chromite ore vs nickel ore.
Aparently he does not completely understand the subject.

Similarly, it is not an issue of Noront's E/W road vs KWG's N/S railway. It is both AND it is also both for Noront's chromite along with KWG's. All chromite needs railway transportation, period.

"There is also the thorny question of KWG’s proposed Chinese government-owned railroad in Ontario replete with Red Army staff et al."
Run for the woods, Reds are comming.

Yes an author wants to draw in readers to read an article but that should not be at the peril of misinforming that reader.