Goodheart'r you wrote:

"Just think that if you yourself were going to spend TWO BILLION on a railroad or even if you were the government ,ask yourself truly , Would you advance the money and commit it to a project that could be held up for decades if the natives who the supreme court of Canada says the natives have to agree "

I don't agree with your statement that the supreme court requires Natives to agree.

Just look at this ruling yesterday by the Supreme Court.

http://www.lfpress.com/2017/07/26/line-9-supreme-court-has-sided-with-pipeline-giant-enbridge-over-local-indigenous-communitys-opposition

In the financial post article link below it states:

"The justices wrote that the Crown “always holds ultimate responsibility for ensuring consultation is adequate” as part of the rationale for its decision.

It said in its ruling that Enbridge’s consultation process was “manifestly adequate.” The Calgary-based company hosted several oral hearings before work on the pipeline began. Locals were also given adequate time to submit written concerns to the NEB, the ruling said.

http://business.financialpost.com/commodities/energy/canadian-press-news-alert-supreme-court-rules-neb-can-fulfil-duty-to-consult/wcm/53cc18f3-d984-4c8c-a3f1-c7cc79ce602d