HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Tesla....More Power = More Nickel = Noront Victory...

Victory mine that is...What do I mean by that? ...Well..If we can prove we have more nickel...Which I get the feeling our overlords are telling us to do...Then perhaps we will become worthy of Elon's ear, and our government's favour. Battery Day I believe has set things in motion. Canada has always been agreeable to doing business with anyone. But it is our US neighbour, and partner in all of this, who has to get their house in order.

Therefore, IMO, and I do stress IMO, nothing will come to fruition until after the US election is over and we either see civil war, or national unity. Elon, however, has made it quite clear he has a timeline to follow, so it would NOT surprise me if he moves his focus North, to Canada, where at least he can keep doing business under friendlier circumstances. It will be the US who holds things back. Let us pray our American counterparts come to their senses...But until then I believe our government will at least finally follow Elon's lead and invest in the Ring of Fire...Remember...Tesla is more than just cars...We should be happy that it is all about the bottom line and counting the nickels...Which Noront just happens to have a lot of...

https://insideevs.com/news/445037/tesla-tabless-cell-design-more-energy-range-power/amp/

In order to achieve its mission, it needs vehicle battery production to grow by 100 times compared to what it is today. In terms of grid batteries, a growth of over 1600 times is needed. Tesla plans to pull this off through a number of projects, including more gigafactories and more affordable cells, which will lead to more affordable cars......

TM.

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply