HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: Barbu, NOT to T/O SPQ you say?....
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
Barbu, NOT to T/O SPQ you say?....
13
johndefur
Feb 13, 2010 05:41PM
Re: Barbu, NOT to T/O SPQ you say?....
17
newbers2
Feb 14, 2010 11:31AM
Re: Barbu, NOT to T/O SPQ you say?....
18
rockstar
Feb 14, 2010 12:55PM
Icon president Re: Barbu, NOT to T/O SPQ you say?....JD
22
geoprof
Feb 14, 2010 01:05PM
Re: Barbu, NOT to T/O SPQ you say?....JD
3
Chauncey Gardiner
Feb 14, 2010 01:39PM
Re: Barbu, NOT to T/O SPQ you say?....JD
7
johndefur
Feb 14, 2010 02:04PM
Icon president Re: Barbu, NOT to T/O SPQ you say?....
4
Sum4All
Feb 14, 2010 04:43PM

I here you loud and clear Sum4All,

However, for companies that may be further ahead in their drilling and have already hit traces of Nickel, maybe worth early discussions with these companies, it may be a win win situation. The key element here is to consilidate so that NOT can have control of all the Nickel.

9 Recommendations
Re: Barbu, NOT to T/O SPQ you say?....
3
vermillion
Feb 14, 2010 05:21PM
Re: Barbu, NOT to T/O SPQ you say?....

coolhandluke
Feb 14, 2010 06:34PM
Re: Barbu, NOT to T/O SPQ you say?....
17
Edgy
Feb 14, 2010 10:56PM
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
Share
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply