"I'm assuming when you said the article "isn't optimistic" you were referring to the prospects of shrinking chips to the 14nm node, and not that the plight of POET isn't optimistic."

I was saying that the article is not optimistic about EUV.

"The fact that you think an article from a year ago is ancient is entirely the point. It isn't really ancient because the problems from a year ago (indeed from 6 years ago) are still present today. All that has changed is the level of urgency to produce a new solution."

Went over my head.