All good arguments. Andrea provides the possible options and respective merits. DNWL provides reasoning with respect to the factors and the importance of influence/vision of leadership i.e. CEO.

What about the good Dr and his wants/needs?

How altruistic is POET and do they want to share the technology and not have it "disrupt" the market place?

What about the UCONN licensing rearrangement which made a significant commitment to own shares vice royalty? Which of the options would benefit the UCONN and all its shares? There must have been some information in this regard to permit them to make them do what they did.

On a separate note about disruptive technologies and military applications. Could US laws and BAE sequester some aspects of the tech?