I spent some time looking into the nomination process recently. Any nomination requires considerable academic evidence snd support from academic peers. It also require a nominator of some significance.

Frankly, I felt that this board is unlikely to be able to provide anything other than an encouraging pressures group to the process. I also felt that the project had some way to run before any meaningful evidence could be assembled.

The right source for any nomination to the Nobel committee would have to come fom academia and a letter to the Dean of The University of Connecticut introducing the idea is about as far as we as a group could Logically go at this stsge.