John, you asked a question about Eileen, and it was quickly and accurately answered. Just because she did not answer it herself, is a nice red herring you immediately threw out there, as you surely understand that she may well have other things to do than watch this board every minute. The answer to your question was given in the hope of getting on with other discussion and ending your now obviously disengenous "confusion."

Later, you come up with,

"perhaps using such term" Poet Office Group" was quite intentional and having connection to Poet is what meant to imply to readers!! This term quite deceitful opens doors for misleading people specially new investors whomight think of Eileen as an insider and rely on her comments."

Well, any investor, new or old, that thought Eileen was an insider and was posting the type of things she posts on a regular basis, would really have to be an idiot (and probably unethical) to invest in POET, because companies that have insiders that make posts like Eileen are seriously dysfunctional and in serious jeopardy of being severely reprimanded by regulators. Those companies just don't last long for very clear reasons.

So when one speaks of "deceit" and "intention," well, let me put it this way, Eileen's conspicuous disclaimer notice (which is a nice touch on her posts) would be most appropriate for your posts, of which, I guess, there won't be a heck of a lot more.

Other than that, welcome aboard!