Aiming to become the global leader in chip-scale photonic solutions by deploying Optical Interposer technology to enable the seamless integration of electronics and photonics for a broad range of vertical market applications

Free
Message: Re: Warrants, options, the AGM
34
May 30, 2016 10:21AM
10
May 30, 2016 10:46AM
23
May 30, 2016 11:18AM
18
May 30, 2016 11:22AM
22
May 30, 2016 11:36AM
36
May 30, 2016 11:53AM
12
May 30, 2016 12:13PM
16
May 30, 2016 12:30PM
That's what I understood as well, we would vote for or against an extra of options numbered 7.225.667. That's to get the number back to 20% of the total share count. So that would mean we shall agree to more possible dilution caused by the dilution which already happened due to the already exercised warrants and options causing a higher total share count. So keep increasing that number always to 20% would mean that we dilute the dilution more every year, year on year, since the total would always increase more and more. So that would be an endless spiral. ---------------------------- Why can't we just stay with a pool of let's say the current ~36 Mio shares, which allowed to attract talented people like Suresh, Subash and Ajit. Yes the vesting period now is longer. So I would agree on more options which are given with a higher strike price than the highest given already. I think they were at 1,99 CAD. That's a point we have to get back to. I know that this isn't a black & white topic. But I have invested all my money which is available and am still underwater for now more than 2 years. This is very frustrating but my own problem. I have avareged down ever since, but am still in the red, since I have not unlimited cash to invest. And I can't sell shares to exercise options which are well in the money. So I trust the management but want to be treated "fair". So if we gain by a rising share price am happy to agree. But I don't want to agree on more deletion which ever gets more and more and the SP is not moving but the market cap is ever rising. And more dilution would lead to just more of that, sustained or lower SP with increasing value of the company. I just want that both increases the same way, company & the SP.
6
May 30, 2016 08:32PM
24
May 30, 2016 08:47PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply