Re: Violation
in response to
by
posted on
Jan 15, 2021 10:49AM
I think it would be worthwhile to review what the intent is instead of going back several days before we had clarification from TM. We will be voting to approve the R/S and it will be acted on only if it is needed and it makes sense to do so. Why do you think they are making this request? They have been putting out news that should have got the .75 warrants in the money but it did not happen in the time frame expected.
First the LOI with the biggest compound semiconductor company in the world who supplies 50% of the worlds LED’s. That should have been big news but the stock got hit and hit hard by the small group of .52 holders who shorted the stock. Next POET is being told well it is just an LOI which some on this forum said it does not count for anything because it was not a firm agreement. And that message got through to management so they figured OK well we will be signing a firm agreement and that should solve the recognition thing and the stock will respond. Let’s extend the .75 warrants again. NO it did not move the needle. The goal posts moved again. OK so how about we report on the significant technical achievements and the industry first’s that make this technology a game changer.
Still not enough. OK so let’s put the pedal to the medal and take every opportunity to promote what it is that POET has achieved and educate the market and help investors to understand the enormous value of the optical interposer. Suresh did an outstanding job yesterday! He was on top of his game and looked like he was enjoying himself.
POET is being looked at by big US investors and those investors need to know that POET will be up listing.
In my opinion once POET has approval for an R/S it will be viewed as a guarantee that up listing will happen. And that will be enough to get the monkey off our back and serious US funds taking a position.