Aiming to become the global leader in chip-scale photonic solutions by deploying Optical Interposer technology to enable the seamless integration of electronics and photonics for a broad range of vertical market applications

Free
Message: Re: Consider this (especially last paragraph)

And, speaking of incentives, wouldn't senior management and the Board be more inclined to accept a lower priced offer if the strike price on their millions of options is $1.75 Canadian versus $2.60 to $11.75? Absolutely. Who wins and who loses in that scenario? (rhetorical question)

This was the concern I wanted addressed by management when I emailed.  Suresh does not want to flip this company. He is very proud of what his team is achieving as he should be. And he is very forward thinking on what is next because there is so much he wants to do. That being said as this company matures I believe you will see options exercised as is the norm which will result in much higher rewards than a cheap  takeover.  But if we shut them down by voting no, what do you think the outcome will be? They are being offered sweet deals. Do we want to risk our investment by voting no. That is my immediate concern and as I posted recently I will swallow hard and do what I have to keep them moving forward at a time when there is so much growth to look forward to. 

I am voting yes because I am very concerned what a no vote could mean. I have been in this for way too long to take that risk.

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply