Dear EcoWarrior,

You wrote:  "95% of people would not consider that traditional high-tech today. IMO."

Hmmm... it's a little too "pedestrian"... you know "run of the mill".  You state a percentage (95%) to make it seem as if you've done research (likely just pulled that number out of the air) on the subject, and then tag IMO at the end.  

What are you basing your opinion on actually?  Your opinion is totally weightless.  You've only stated that "others" have "considered" this, and don't even inculde yourself among them.  You need much more to make a credible arguement.

Here... it goes something like this:

In my opinion, PYR is definatley a "Technology" company, BECAUSE it is a company whose primary business is selling patented technology and technical services. They are the global "go-to" for Plasma technology.  Further, PYR is a company with technology or technical services as a key part of its business. ... PYR is a tech company that uses technology to create an unfair advantage in terms of product uniqueness and scale, and will improve margins for their "Industial" customers.

Looking forward to seeing your side of the coin... currently, it is blank

Best regards,
Tim in Vancouver