...We Welcome You To The Resverlogix HUB withIn The AGORACOM COMMUNITY!

Free
Message: Re: BETonMACE Enrollment
7
Mar 21, 2017 04:22PM
7
Mar 24, 2017 03:15PM
3
Mar 24, 2017 03:34PM
2
Mar 25, 2017 10:41AM
4
Mar 25, 2017 11:14AM
2
Mar 25, 2017 02:27PM
5
Mar 25, 2017 04:07PM
6
Mar 26, 2017 03:01PM
3
Mar 28, 2017 03:07PM
3
Mar 28, 2017 03:26PM
2
Mar 28, 2017 03:39PM
4
Jun 28, 2017 10:37AM
6
Aug 28, 2017 12:56PM
3
Aug 28, 2017 01:57PM
1
Aug 28, 2017 02:16PM
2
Aug 28, 2017 03:09PM
3
Aug 28, 2017 10:05PM
6
Aug 29, 2017 08:00AM
4
Aug 29, 2017 09:29AM
6
Aug 30, 2017 06:18PM
3
Aug 30, 2017 07:30PM
3
Aug 30, 2017 08:17PM
15
Sep 02, 2017 12:03PM
2
Sep 02, 2017 12:45PM
3
Sep 02, 2017 02:06PM
3
Sep 02, 2017 02:21PM
5
Dec 14, 2017 04:51PM
3
Dec 15, 2017 12:32AM
7
Dec 15, 2017 11:40AM
4
Dec 15, 2017 01:00PM
2
Dec 15, 2017 02:25PM
4
Dec 15, 2017 07:33PM
3
Jan 11, 2018 02:40PM
6
Jan 11, 2018 03:01PM
3
Jan 11, 2018 03:29PM
2
Feb 28, 2018 03:21PM
7
Mar 01, 2018 11:38AM
1
Mar 01, 2018 02:17PM
4
Feb 08, 2019 10:07AM
2
Feb 08, 2019 04:50PM
4
Feb 08, 2019 11:03PM
1
Feb 09, 2019 02:43PM

Feb 09, 2019 03:31PM
3
Feb 09, 2019 03:52PM

Feb 09, 2019 04:14PM
1
Feb 09, 2019 08:00PM
2
Feb 09, 2019 09:12PM
2
Feb 10, 2019 12:33PM
1
Feb 11, 2019 09:05AM
1
Feb 22, 2019 04:10PM
3
Feb 22, 2019 05:31PM
3
Feb 22, 2019 10:59PM

"Similar not same. The sites work TOGETHER. Like picking up a shovel without three fingers, you can do it but it's a lot more difficult. This is probably one reason why RVX208 has been shown to be much less potent than JQ1 on a number of pathways which likely contributes to its good safety profile

"The transcriptional effect of (+)-JQ1 is 10x higher than that of RVX-208"

It's more complex than potency, as detailed in my prior post. If it was only about potency, as you imply, then a pan-BET inhibitor could just be dosed at a lower level to achieve the same "less potent" effect of a BD-2 selective inhibitor. As stated before, different inhibitors can have different structures, bind to different regions of the bromodomain acetyl-lysine binding pocket, elicit different conformational shifts in the bromodomain, have different pharmacokinetics, different tissue distribution, have different affinities for BD2 vs. BD1. All of these things influence the unique gene expression changes elicited by different BET inhibitors. Yes, BD1 and BD2 are both required for normal BET function. But selective inhibition of BD1 or BD2 elicit unique transcriptional changes. And even if one compares different BD2 selective inhibitors such as apabetalone, RVX-297 and ABBV-744, they all bind BD2 slightly differently and these differences give rise to a unique gene expression profile change for each inhibitor. With all due respect, trust me I'm a biochemist...LOL.

"Furthermore, based on the abundance of available data on apabetalone, there is simply no way to see the level of impact without targeting the mitochondria. There is no removal of inflammation, no improvement of kidney function, no reduction in atherosclerosis without an improvement in the mitochondria."

Nice hypothesis. Now show me some apabetalone data supporting your hypothesis showing that apabetalone modulates gene expression related to mitochondrial function and  electron transport chain function. The data might exist, but so far you haven't provided  anything to support your hypothesis. You can't rely on data from a pan-BET inhibitor in a cell line to infer apabetalone effects in a whole animal.

BearDownAZ

1
Aug 18, 2019 10:29AM
5
Aug 18, 2019 01:02PM
3
Aug 18, 2019 01:47PM
2
Aug 18, 2019 01:57PM
3
Aug 18, 2019 02:26PM
3
Aug 18, 2019 02:28PM
3
Aug 18, 2019 04:41PM
2
Aug 18, 2019 04:59PM
3
Aug 18, 2019 06:54PM
3
Aug 18, 2019 07:04PM
4
Aug 18, 2019 08:24PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply