Great discussion on MACE Events. Personally I find the RRR and P topics so confounding that even after I had discussions with people in the field who tried to dummy it down for me, I am still fuzzy as to what I would want to read in a more detailed PR.

I would suggest the most ironic thing is that after waiting for years for the conclusion of the trial and the results, that if a PR was issued with detailed results and did not say specifically topline results were met (I know that is not reality), 99% of the people here would have no clue if the PR was good or bad. Imagine if the stock halted and your quote system went down and Bear was on vacation in the Himalayas and could not post, would you have a clue if the stock was going to explode or tank?

Most of us are working off educated guesses on what is statistically significant, gut feelings and hope on this stock. Just saying.