Re: Let's play a what if...
in response to
by
posted on
Nov 28, 2019 01:37PM
KOO - "not less than 90%" wasn't really the point I was making. "shares not already held by the offeror" was the point. Yours had said, "90% approval of shareholders" which would be all RVX shares including HL and EC rather than just the shares excluding HL and EC. Your example showed it correctly though, just the preceding statements wasn't quite accurate.