RVXOT - fair enough.  No matter the categories it does all substantiate the notion that RVX is, overall, not widely held and that daily trading only covers a bit more than a sliver of common share ownership.  Following up on Toniv's last post, one can't help but wonder what the SP would be had RVX been able to secure a listing on a US listing as they had planned to do at some point last year.

All retail investor eyes and ears will no doubt be on the AGM next week.  Format notwithstanding, it should (and had better!) provide clear direction as to where it's all headed for this company.  There have been a number of definitive pronouncements made over the past year that require substantiation by management. Despite the frustrations expressed on this board, there are many reasons for optimism as relates to the science and the benefits stemming there from, and in the end that is what will win the day.