Free
Message: Re: splitting SMH may or may not be good
3
Oct 19, 2009 12:39PM

Oct 19, 2009 12:41PM

Oct 19, 2009 12:55PM
3
Oct 19, 2009 01:04PM

Oct 19, 2009 01:08PM
2
Oct 19, 2009 01:11PM

Oct 19, 2009 01:13PM
1
Oct 26, 2009 11:22AM

Oct 26, 2009 12:15PM

Oct 26, 2009 12:29PM
2
Oct 26, 2009 07:51PM

Oct 26, 2009 10:15PM
1
Oct 26, 2009 10:21PM
2
Oct 26, 2009 10:41PM
1
Oct 26, 2009 11:09PM
1
Oct 27, 2009 03:22PM

You are right Sidewinder about comparing companies as management of those companies is the determining factor along with property value.

With Shoreham I do not believe they will split at the end of the day. Firstly it is too costly and secondly it is too time consuming. The obvious with 53Million fully diluted would be to sell off the Canadian Properties. It is possible and all you have to do is research Mulgravian, Wintercrest and the people behind it all. Then look long and hard at the Uranium property that Shoreham has. Value is there.

So in my world if they take 1Million in cash and stock from a fully liquid company then they get to work in Guyana. That gives their stock a boost and they can then do a good financing of upwards to $5 Million ($10 M with Warrants exercised). That would put Guyana into production on a small scale and a few good feasibility reports on properties in that Black Banana area. Are you listening Mr. Bending to your shareholders.

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply