Thank you Kelsee,

I appreciate your comment and analysis of my note.  However, at the worst, I think you should consider my comment low key.  But let me truly clarify my earlier statement.  Firstly, my comment was not to target any specific company in McFaulds.  Secondly my interest was in expressing that a company may not have 20 hot targets.  They may have 2 to say.... 4, but someone else may have 9.  It is not to say that the 2 to 4 anomalies won't work out to be monstrous and perhaps even more valuable than the company with 9, just that the market might perceive the more the merrier.  I would personally rather wait for drill cores as much as a high number of anomalies might be encouraging.  I personally have, for me, what I consider to be a tidy number of shares in SPQ, NOT, BMK and JDs favourite, UC :).    So don't think that I'm not a closet pumper.