You really like to attack people, even more than I do.

Let's both try to stop playing jazz, OK?

And thanks for pointing out that it was actually a lower G/t in the Nic Lake press release. But what do you think about the idea that a smaller ellipsoid used means a smaller tonnage to mine and truck down to the processing facility planned for the Ormsby site being an economic decision.

I am trying to understand how important the resource at NL is, with the transportation dimension, as compared to the main resource at Ormsby. That the larger drill can only go to 500m vice the factually incorrect 600m I said is not the issue. The issue is that going to even 500m vice the 200m of the smaller drill will extend the depth of the resource at the principle site. Extending the life of the mine, even if it will have to go underground at some point. Ekati is doing this now, after open pit for the top portion of their kimberlite, they are now going underground for the deeper parts.

Why not focus on the discussion without the attacks?

SKELEG