TYHEE GOLD CORP

(PRESS PROFILE TAB FOR FACT SHEET & UPDATES)

Free
Message: Gold market today

Tyhee's so-called "Secret" Is Neither Dirty, Little nor is it a Secret.

in response to by
posted on Sep 17, 2009 11:46AM

Mises,

I would suppose, if you were a Romarco Minerals investor last December, you'd be asking the same question, "What is Romarco's dirty little secret?" Because back then, Romarco was trading at about where Tyhee is now: stuck in a low priced trading range.

But then came their Feas. study, permitting progress and financing, and Romarco (God bless them) answered your "dirty little secret" question with an ELEVEN BAGGER!

It's no secret that Tyhee has stated that it will have a Pre-feas. sometime in "early 2010" Moreover, progress towards permitting is being made. Then there's Clan Lake archived assays to be released soon, followed by fresh core assays from Clan and maybe Goodwin Lake. Oh, and let's not forget what Viking Gold may have discovered on Tyhee's property line. Those assays should be available soon.

Also, please keep in mind that Tyhee wants to go it alone into production. It has no avowed desire to get acquired. So, I think that many investors may not see the likelihood of making gains as quickly as they would if they invested in a company like Kimber Resources, for example, where Kimber's avowed endgame is to be acquired, not to go it alone into production. If a junior is to get acquired soon, it is sometimes seen that there will be a jump up in its share price, which some may think would happen a lot sooner than would be the case if they now invest in Tyhee, where waiting until early next year would be when its share price could blast off. But, if what happened at Romarco this year is any indication of what could happen next year at Tyhee, then waiting another several months for Tyhee's new economic report, its Clan Lake results adding to a new resource estimate, and permitting progress, then that wait may be well worth it.

Cheers,

Baires

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply