What Irks Jim Puplava the Most About Webb and Tyhee?

I'm not sure.

Since Jim never replied to my emails in June asking him to support his criticisms of Webb and Tyhee, I just don't know what's behind his thinking.

When I read over Jim's June emails, the points he never supported looked a lot like what Mr. VIti wrote me. And, point for point, as you may recall. Dave Webb, Hysteria and I debunked each criticism of his with accurate and reasonable responses.

Then soon after the Viti exchange there was that infamous June Q-Line comment of JP's

Then again, Jim never broadcasted my Q-Call question the week following his proclamation that a company resembling "Tyhee's" management did not have the "depth" to go into production as they had " not kept their promises", blah, blah blah. (You can hear that Q-Call criticism of his by clicking the RECENT UPDATES section of this Hub Page, " Jim Dissing Tyhee" June 14, 2010") So, we again don't really know why he broadcasted those harsh comments.

My Q-Call, that never got broadcasted, essentially asked Jim to elaborate on why he apparently made those comments about management's lacking depth. It was the second Q-call of probably hundreds I've made over the years to FSN that Jim blackballed.

Again, what's behind these unsupported criticisms of his? I just don't know. We can only speculate, since JP's not saying, only attacking and not responding with explanations. It may be quite astute for him to dodge giving reasonable explanations and opening a discussion about his reasonings that might show that he's as "off-base" as Mr. Viti had been shown to be.

Isaiah's suggestion that Jim's upset with Webb's Clan drill program, designed to delineate the size of a potential super deposit, and not to go after those big grade holes first, may just be one more thing irking JP. But again, JP never mentioned that. I say, Jim's smart enough to know he's no geologist, and criticizing Webb on his turf would be more than "off-base".

Tyhee is scientifically "building", delineating, discovering the size of the deposit at Clan Lake. Let them do it in a way that a professional geologist would, not a marketing financial person might. Yes, we can see a potential friction here, as Isaiah seems to be saying.

But, when it comes to what really irks JP, the one explanation that I enjoy the most comes out of that email my friend sent me this morning,

"JP is as wrong as most of the posters on this hub. Webb has not changed from his stated purpose. What has happened is that JP like too many others here own entirely too much of this stock and blame Webb because it hasn't made them rich in the time plan they had estimated and they can't sell without slitting their own throat. So, JP like most others have begun forming arguments about why Webb is a problem and know more about what Webb should be doing than Webb does. " -my friend.

By the way, if any of you would like to suggest what I might ask JP in my next Q-call, please send me a Private Message with your suggestions.

Much appreciated.

Cheers,

Baires