Re: PTSC / E.D. TX / and Obviousness Test. / DaBoss/jhawk
in response to
by
posted on
Aug 28, 2007 08:19AM
DABOSS...
"If the Georgia little league team can hit the walk off, no reason why EDIG can't...and they are in the on deck circle."..., and, it is the top of the 9th inning...
"Prior art", "Obviousness" and other tests making the rounds in the Courts at present are meant to cover situations like PTSC, where a Patantee, (the person granted a patent), just sits on its patents doing nothing with it, and someone else comes along, looks at it a bit, then tweeks it in his own way, and puts it in use in the market place making millions...
If PTSC has fared as well as we know in their law suit, (winning the Markman Hearing), and only had to drop an objection to one of the defenses of defendants, just think how good a case EDIG has as compared to PTSC's...
EDIG was not sitting on their Patents. They were the progenators of the FLASH market. From Intel, to T.I., to Fujitsue, to Samsung, and so on, everyone was "Partenering" with them to help create the market that is at $25 Billion and growing...
I would love to see Jobs raise "Prior art", "Oviousness", and so on, as a defense to an EDIG law suit naming him as a defendant and asking for a part of Billions he made on Ipod by using Portal Player chips, reverse engineering them in his labs and filing for his own patents. DM should have a lot of fun with that...
Things are looking better as we are getting closer to the end of this journey, and those who get too confused with the legal jargon will miss a chance of a life time to make some money in this stock...
GLTA...
Gil...
P.S. to Daboss and Jhawk ...
Did you see the line for CAL v. Tenn. next week end? Cal by 6...
Gil...