All eyes are on you silver..... thanks for your efforts.

Sky, sorry to hear of your circumstance, hope it all works out .

All the talk is over....we have discussed this thing technically and legally, 9 ways to Sunday.

The process we have waited for is underway and, we all seem to agree that DM is a good fit. It's now time to put it to the test...in all respects.

Now we sit back and watch how it shakes out.

Take satisfaction in the fact that, we were here long before the pros got involved.

If e.Digital comes out on top....it's because of its investor base. We held this company together durring it's worst....pitted against an onslaught of redicule.

This is my defination of investing....comittment to an idea.

I do not put into "The first rule of investing" when it comes to the incubationan of an idea.

As I read in a previous post..."What is a "Markman" hearing? ......The second step is a determination of whether the allegedly infringing device falls within the boundary of protection granted to the patent holder. Simply put, for a patent owner to be successful in a patent infringement suit, at least one claim of the patent must be infringed.

We're on our way...my fingers are crossed for all the true longs.
doni