"My concern is the manner they use to manage the FAT .....do they do it in the same manner e.Digital does. How do they manage the virtual tables? Within the flash,  or , status quo through RAM processes?"

That statement may be out of scale with regard to punctuation and grammar....however, I don't give a rats ass.

I'm dead serious when I comment of the manner that e.Digital manages FAT and hands it off to a higher level OS.

They announced their ability over 3 years ago...the ability of 12..16 and 32.

There are no explanations of how they do it, however, If they are doing it under their proprietary ability...I can most definitely see how they would do it...and it would be without  normally associated allocation tables. Their ability is physical location within the flash...and that is the level they would manage FAT....under a physical condition...not virtually with significant RAM resource as others would have to do.

DM is looking at something serious...and I have no doubt they understand it.

doni