There is a difference between the PTSC NDA'S and those EDIG has been known to entertain in the past...

EDIG NDA'S related to ongoing business activity which was meant as a face saving device for the companys using EDIG technology in an ongoing operation, leaving to the "Customer" the discretion to make any announcement as to use of EDIG technology...

On the other hand, PTSC settlements were a one time affair and in such settlements NDA'S are often made a part of the settlement discussions. EDIG could care less one way or the other. If they get more money for an NDA concerning amount or terms of the setlement they should accept it...

The difference as to "effect of NDA as between EDIG and PTSC lies in the MARKET'S perception as to the "INTENT" of the NDA...

In PTSC case the MARKET, properly so, sees the NDA as a negative in that any non-disclosure as to the amounts of settlement means that the sharegholders are not privy to how the funds shall be utilized by a company which is controlled by financial institutions, and has no business, ( like eVU), they can expand.

On the other hand EDIG is not a company dependant solely on monetization of their Technology. Any funds they receive shall be userd in its currently expanding business of marketing eVU and its progeny, growing to a solid technology company...

GLTA...

Gil...