Free
Message: Re: EDIG / PTSC doni
5
Mar 09, 2008 06:12PM

Mar 09, 2008 06:26PM
1
Mar 09, 2008 08:02PM

Mar 10, 2008 07:37AM
1
Mar 10, 2008 10:12AM

Mar 10, 2008 10:32AM

Mar 10, 2008 10:42AM

Mar 10, 2008 10:50AM

Mar 10, 2008 10:59AM

Mar 10, 2008 11:32AM
2
Mar 10, 2008 03:27PM
1
Mar 10, 2008 05:10PM
1
Mar 10, 2008 05:41PM
1
Mar 10, 2008 06:02PM
1
Mar 10, 2008 06:09PM
1
Mar 10, 2008 06:17PM
1
Mar 10, 2008 09:44PM
3
Mar 11, 2008 02:26AM
1
Mar 11, 2008 03:35AM
4
Mar 11, 2008 04:46AM
1
Mar 11, 2008 05:00AM

Mar 11, 2008 07:23AM

Mar 11, 2008 12:54PM

Mar 11, 2008 01:23PM
1
Mar 11, 2008 04:28PM

Mar 11, 2008 04:46PM
1
Mar 11, 2008 05:06PM

Mar 11, 2008 06:04PM
1
Mar 11, 2008 07:39PM
2
Mar 11, 2008 07:54PM

It was a hypothetical comment. If they, or a company that might implement a licenced agreement of a processor platform, it would not be hard to utilize particular claims of 445.

PTSC started out with Shaboom matching a simplified 32bit processor register scheme and buss structure matched to cheap 8bit memory. The concept was to match a 32bit process to cheap memory. They have moved beyond that, however....for this, they implement a direct connect processor to DRAM or Alt connect to EPROM...Their moving to an EEPROM or for a  more manageable nonvolatile environment is not far fetched. See figures. See figure 6 and 3 of 5809336. 445 can implement/format EEPROM(NOR Flash) or  Flash(NAND).

Even better...look at figure 9...which is a completely different approach and visualize that as a nonvolatile environment.

 What e.Digital does with a nonvolatile environment is shrink infostructure.

doni

 

 

 

 


Mar 12, 2008 06:42AM

Mar 12, 2008 06:47AM
1
Mar 12, 2008 06:58AM
1
Mar 12, 2008 08:07AM
2
Mar 12, 2008 09:18AM
1
Mar 12, 2008 10:10AM
3
Mar 12, 2008 12:10PM

Mar 12, 2008 01:03PM
4
Mar 12, 2008 01:12PM
4
Mar 12, 2008 01:39PM

Mar 13, 2008 08:27AM

Mar 13, 2008 08:58AM

Mar 13, 2008 09:13AM

Mar 13, 2008 09:16AM

Mar 13, 2008 09:20AM

Mar 13, 2008 09:35AM
1
Mar 13, 2008 09:55AM
1
Mar 13, 2008 09:58AM
1
Mar 13, 2008 10:19AM
1
Mar 13, 2008 10:21AM
1
Mar 13, 2008 10:55AM
1
Mar 13, 2008 11:00AM
1
Mar 13, 2008 11:02AM

Mar 13, 2008 12:08PM

Mar 13, 2008 12:20PM

Mar 13, 2008 12:21PM

Mar 13, 2008 12:45PM

Mar 13, 2008 03:19PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply