Are you implying EDig could be in the same boat (being an infringer) as we are saying those companies we are suing as being infringers?

That would be quite interesting but I do believe, perhaps incorrectly, that a company like DM would have done extensive research in all areas of these lawsuits, especially in the area of EDig patents being bona fide. It is inconceiveable to me that DM would take on EDig as a client on contingency with KNOWING the basis of the lawsuits (EDig's patents)  were valid or not. EVen if they found them to be valid but had "hairs" on them I do no think DM would be in for this ride.