Free
Message: Re: MY OBSERVATION AT S.H.M
11
Sep 17, 2008 08:08PM
2
Sep 17, 2008 08:58PM
14
Sep 17, 2008 10:20PM
1
Sep 17, 2008 10:59PM

Sep 18, 2008 12:26AM
1
Sep 18, 2008 05:08AM
1
Sep 18, 2008 05:23AM

"15. They are after VIVITAR for infringing removable flash not for CMOS imaging processor"

Not the processor....the process of moving data from the sensor to the flash...be it removable or embedded.

Was the Vivitar deal over image files to flash or audio files to flash.

That was my consideration. Vivitar ask to have their case combined to the 2nd case. e.Digital/DM noted to the court, that the case was a separate indifferent use of the patents and should not be reassigned.

Was it for imaging or audio?

I only got carried away with the possibilities of having the process self contained on the image sensor CMOS.



Very good sman998....did he look at you funny when you asked the question?....lol

doni

3
Sep 18, 2008 05:42AM

Sep 18, 2008 06:10AM

Sep 18, 2008 06:36AM

Sep 18, 2008 06:39AM

Sep 18, 2008 06:57AM
1
Sep 18, 2008 07:27AM

Sep 18, 2008 07:30AM

Sep 18, 2008 08:19AM

Sep 18, 2008 08:20AM
4
dlj
Sep 18, 2008 09:28PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply